By: Vrinda Bagaria
The author is a second-year law student at Jindal Global Law School at Jindal Global University. She can be reached at 23jgls-vrinda1@jgu.edu.in.
Image Source: Politicians play on the fear of immigrants in Assam | The Caravan Creator: Piyal Bhattacharjee
Introduction
The massive influx of immigrants from Bangladesh into the Indian state of Assam has long been a source of controversy. This essay explores the complex nature of this movement, recognizing the necessity for a nuanced strategy as well as possible security risks. Although the increase in illegal migration raises concerns about demographic shifts and resource depletion, it is important to acknowledge the beneficial contributions made by legal citizens of Bangladesh. This essay makes the case that India's capacity to handle the issue efficiently will determine whether this migration poses an inevitable threat to national security. India can handle this delicate issue in a way that protects national security while addressing the core causes of Bangladeshi migration, facilitating legal immigration, and prioritizing border security while promoting a well-integrated society.
The IMDT Act
In 1998, The Governor of Assam addressed concerns regarding illegal immigration from Bangladesh and how it posed a threat to the country’s national security. The Illegal Migration (Determination by Tribunals) Act, of 1983 (IMDT Act) was established to combat this. The act, which is only applicable in Assam, changed the burden of proof in trials involving foreigners so that accusers must now establish the foreign status of the defendant rather than the accused. The Supreme Court discovered that very few of the suspected unlawful migrants were identified as such and even fewer were deported, despite multiple inquiries made under the Unlawful Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act (IMDT Act).
This significant disparity with the deportation statistics from West Bengal demonstrated the IMDT Act's inefficiency. The Court declared it unconstitutional because it went against the Union's obligation to defend the states against outside invasion. The Supreme Court declared the IMDT Act as ineffectual in terms of reducing illegal migration from Bangladesh. The IMDT Act was declared illegal by the Court due to its lower deportation rate when compared to the Foreigners Act. Through the Foreigners Act of 1946, the Court established additional tribunals, which resulted in more migrant deportation. The effectiveness of these tribunals is still in doubt considering the high number of Bangladeshi nationals who entered India lawfully but then vanished, suggesting that law enforcement's expulsion and detection efforts were inadequate.
Factors Driving Migration
The reasons behind an individual's voluntary migration or forced relocation are multifaceted and intricate. National, social, political, economic, and environmental constraints, or even personal whims, may influence someone to travel across borders and establish fresh roots in another nation. Various political and economic factors, including social unrest, religious persecution, political upheaval, economic stagnation, a lack of job opportunities, demographic pressures, and environmental crises, have forced Bangladeshi citizens to flee their country and migrate to India. The availability of land, improved economic prospects, access to healthcare and education, and a comparable cultural environment have all drawn these people to India at the same time.
Threat Posed by Illegal Immigration
Bangladeshi illegal immigration is a danger to India's security, especially in Assam. Through an increase in crime and bogus documentation, it has exacerbated intergroup violence, destabilized areas, and undermined the rule of law. Population imbalances, hostilities between migrant and indigenous communities, and a drop in public confidence in authority have all been brought on by the inflow. Furthermore, uncontrolled borders encourage the smuggling of weapons, the funding of extremist organizations such as the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) and the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) and transnational criminal activity. The October 30, 2009, attacks in Assam, resulting in 83 civilian deaths and 30 injuries, are attributed to ULFA, NDFB, and Harkat-ul-Jihadi-e-Islami (HuJI). The usage of RDX indicates the involvement of the HuJI. These insurgent groups, operating from Bangladeshi bases, exploit illegal migrants for intelligence and support, exacerbating the situation. This emphasizes how crucial it is to have strong security measures in places like Dimapur to combat the growing threat present.
Economic Contributions and Human Rights
It is, however, important to distinguish between immigrants from Bangladesh who have legal status and those without. The legal migration of many Bangladeshis to Assam has greatly boosted the state's economy. Bangladeshi immigrants, both legal and illegal, make up a sizable share of the labour force in the crucial tea sector of Assam. These people have a significant impact on Assam's economic prosperity. Regardless of their immigration status, all Bangladeshis should be treated with dignity and respect. Marginalizing this vulnerable population might damage bilateral relations between Bangladesh and India, and upend the tea sector.
Balancing Security and Inclusion
In the context of illegal immigration, striking a balance between the concerns of national security and the ideals of social inclusion is a challenge that calls for a diversified strategy. Unchecked illegal immigration has the potential to deplete resources, jeopardize national security, and sabotage societal cohesiveness. To protect national interests, strong border controls, efficient law enforcement, and quick deportation procedures are necessary. It is equally important, though, to stay away from laws that stigmatize or discriminate against immigrants based on their immigration status alone. A thorough approach must distinguish between legal immigrants, who make substantial contributions to resident cultures, and illegal immigrants, who must be treated by the law. Moreover, addressing the root causes of illegal migration, such as poverty and conflict, through international cooperation and development aid can reduce the pressure on borders and create pathways for legal migration. To successfully integrate legal immigrants into society, it is necessary to support language learning, cultural sensitivity, and access to basic amenities.
Conclusion
India is faced with a dilemma because of the flood of Bangladeshi migrants into Assam. National security must be given priority while upholding social inclusion. Although there are many problems associated with illegal immigration, such as imbalances in population and security, it is crucial to acknowledge the economic contributions made by legal migrants. Strong border security measures must be combined with initiatives to integrate lawful immigrants into the community in an integrated approach. Long-term solutions need to address the root problems of migration and promote collaboration with Bangladesh. India can efficiently control the migrant inflow, reduce security threats, and foster a peaceful and inclusive society by putting these policies into place.
Bibliography
1. Upadhyay, A. (2005). The “Infiltrator” Issue. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(28), 3002–3004. Https://www.jstor.org/stable/4416867
2. Ahmed, S. Z. (2006). IDENTITY ISSUE, FOREIGNER’S DEPORTATION MOVEMENT AND ERSTWHILE EAST BENGAL (PRESENT BANGLADESH) ORIGIN PEOPLE OF ASSAM. In Proceedings of the Indian History Congress (Vols. 67–67, pp. 624–639). Indian History Congress. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44147982
3. Ahmed, S. Z. (2006). IDENTITY ISSUE, FOREIGNER’S DEPORTATION MOVEMENT AND ERSTWHILE EAST BENGAL (PRESENT BANGLADESH) ORIGIN PEOPLE OF ASSAM. In Proceedings of the Indian History Congress (Vols. 67–67, pp. 624–639). Indian History Congress. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44147982
4. Goswami, N. (n.d.). Bangladeshi Illegal Migration into Assam: Issues and Concerns from the Field. In IDSA Issue Brief (pp. 1–4). https://idsa.in/system/files/IB_BangladeshiIllegalMigrationintoAssam.pdf
5. Das, P., Kumari, G., & Patankar, V. (2016). Illegal Migration From Bangladesh. In IDSA Monograph Series. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. http://www.idsa.in
6. Fernandes, W. (2005). IMDT Act and Immigration in North-Eastern India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(30), 3237–3240. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4416922
7. Not Found. (n.d.). Drishti IAS. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/bangladesat%20Situation,Hasina's%20tenure%20began%20in%202008.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author (s). They do not reflect the views or opinions of Diplomania or its members.
Comments